Peatlands cover only a small part of Bulgaria’s territory, yet they are extremely important for water, biodiversity and climate. At the same time, much remains unknown – particularly about peat-forming wetlands and peat soils. Where are they located? What condition are they in? Which of them have the potential to be restored? These are just some of the questions we still need to answer.
Systematically mapping these areas is a major challenge – but one worth taking on.
This was one of the key messages to emerge from the National Roundtable on the Conservation and Restoration of Peatlands and Peat-forming Wetlands in Bulgaria, held on 24 September at the Ministry of Environment and Water.
The roundtable brought together two complementary strands of the Bulgarian Biodiversity Foundation’s work on peatlands. The project “Chairite Lakes – Biodiversity Capsules in the Rhodopes”, supported by DEVIN EAD, has enabled us to build three years of practical experience – from scientific research and monitoring of a specific peatland complex to the first restoration measures. The “Peatland Futures” project, supported by the European Climate Initiative (EUKI), allows us to take this conversation to the national level while drawing on the experience of international organisations with long-standing expertise in peatland conservation and restoration. Through the partnership, we are also following how countries in Central and Eastern Europe, including Slovenia and Slovakia, are addressing data gaps and developing national approaches to peatland conservation and restoration.
In this way, the practical experience gained at Chairite connects with a much broader question: how can Bulgaria improve its knowledge of its peatlands and peat-forming wetlands and develop a coherent approach to their conservation and restoration?
The meeting was opened by Kostadin Geshev, Deputy Minister of Environment and Water, who pointed out that Bulgarian peatlands occur outside the ecological optimum of these habitat types in Europe, making them particularly vulnerable and limiting their capacity for natural recovery. Although Bulgaria has not experienced peat extraction on a large scale, some of these ecosystems have been altered or destroyed through drainage, reservoir construction and other human activities. He therefore stressed the need to improve knowledge of their distribution and condition and to plan realistic restoration measures.
Spas Uzunov from BBF placed peatlands at the intersection of several major issues – nature conservation, water, climate change, land use and the future financing of restoration. Bulgaria already has scientific research, mapping and monitoring, as well as practical experience from sites such as Vitosha and the Chairite Lakes. However, a comprehensive picture is still missing, particularly when it comes to historically drained wetlands, peat-forming wetlands and peat soils.
Assoc. Prof. Rayna Natcheva from the Institute of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Research at the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences (IBER-BAS) demonstrated the significance of these knowledge gaps. She presented the available scientific knowledge on the distribution of peat-forming wetlands in Bulgaria and outlined the need for a national inventory that would provide a more precise picture of their distribution, condition and threats. Other necessary steps include more systematic monitoring and an assessment of the restoration potential of degraded, drained or historically altered areas. For some lowland peat-accumulating habitats, for example, their current distribution and extent, present condition and restoration prospects remain unknown.
What does peatland restoration look like in practice?
Following the overview of the scientific knowledge, the discussion moved to two places where restoration is already taking place on the ground.
Rumyana Ivanova from BBF and Petya Manastirska from DEVIN EAD presented three years of work at the Chairite Lakes – from studying the hydrology, biodiversity and condition of the peat islands to the first restoration measures and long-term monitoring. Measures implemented so far include controlling woody vegetation on the peat island and removing part of the encroaching bulrush vegetation. An important next objective is to expand the Chairite Lakes Protected Area to include Golemiya Gyol and the largest floating peat island in the complex, which currently remain outside its boundaries.
An even longer history of practical restoration was presented by Desislava Gyurova from Vitosha Nature Park. At the Konarnika and Chuypetlovo peatlands, restoration has focused primarily on hydrology and vegetation. At Konarnika, a ditch was created to improve the water balance, competing vegetation is regularly removed, and the establishment of planted peat moss fragments is monitored. At Chuypetlovo, a system was built to provide a continuous supply of water to the heavily drained peatland. The experience from Vitosha demonstrates an important lesson: peatland restoration is not a one-off intervention, but a long-term process requiring maintenance, monitoring and adaptation.

Where should we focus our efforts?
If we cannot restore everything at once, the next question is where restoration efforts could have the greatest impact.
Stanimira Ivanova from the University of Forestry presented the Wetland4Change approach to prioritising wetlands based on their capacity for carbon uptake and storage and flood regulation. The aim is to use scientific evidence to direct limited restoration resources towards places where intervention could have the greatest effect. Data from Choklyovo Blato show that even different areas within the same wetland can have different carbon balances depending on their hydrology and vegetation. Restoration decisions therefore need to take into account the specific condition and functioning of a site, rather than its area alone.
Closely linked to the question of data is another challenge: how can we create economic incentives for landowners and land users to restore degraded or drained peatlands? Hugo Henaff from the Michael Succow Foundation, a BBF partner in the Peatland Futures project, presented the EU Carbon Removals and Carbon Farming Certification Framework (CRCF). Under certain conditions, the framework can also cover activities involving raising water levels and rewetting peatlands.
Before such mechanisms can be applied, however, we need to know where these areas are, how they are used, how deep the peat is and to what extent they have been drained. Information on drained peat soils, including those under agricultural use, remains a major knowledge gap in Bulgaria.
From data to national policy
The final presentation brought the discussion back to national policy. Experts from the Ministry of Environment and Water presented the place of peatland habitats within Bulgaria’s National Nature Restoration Plan. Data reported under the Habitats Directive indicate an unfavourable-inadequate conservation status for the habitat types discussed, while knowledge gaps remain for some of the reported areas and also need to be addressed.
During the discussion that followed, representatives of the Ministry noted that Bulgaria still lacks sufficient information on drained peat soils under agricultural use on which to base specific restoration targets. If such data are collected, they could also inform the further development of the National Nature Restoration Plan.
The discussion therefore naturally moved to another question: how can we protect areas that we still do not know well enough? Toma Belev pointed out that peatlands do not exist as a separate category of permanent land use in Bulgaria and proposed that, when future amendments to the Biological Diversity Act are considered, peatlands could be discussed as a distinct object of protection.
Representatives of the Ministry noted that peatlands fall within the broader concept of wetlands and already benefit from certain forms of protection, while also stressing that any future legislative change would need a reliable scientific basis – where exactly these areas are located, what their boundaries and extent are, and what condition they are in. A national inventory therefore emerged not only as a scientific task, but also as an important basis for more effective protection.
Participants also noted that Bulgaria is not starting from scratch. Historical data and previous wetland inventories can provide a starting point for future work. At the same time, some of the available information is not sufficiently detailed to determine the precise location and boundaries of individual peatlands.
The discussion also highlighted the need to involve the Ministry of Agriculture and Food in the next steps. Some areas with restoration potential are agricultural land or pastures, while drained peat soils under agricultural use represent one of the most significant data gaps. Decisions about their future therefore cannot be made solely within the framework of nature conservation policy.
The next step: A national peatland working group
At the end of the meeting, the Ministry of Environment and Water confirmed its readiness to continue the process and to initiate the establishment of a national working group on peatlands. Such a group could bring together scientists, institutions, conservation organisations, landowners and land users, and businesses to work on the issues identified during the roundtable – from common terminology and the systematisation of existing knowledge to a national inventory, legal protection, restoration priorities and potential financing mechanisms.
The Ministry also expressed its readiness for the work carried out under the Chairite Lakes project and the partnership between BBF and DEVIN EAD to be presented in the National Nature Restoration Plan as a good-practice example of how scientific expertise, practical conservation and business support can work together.
The roundtable showed that Bulgaria is not starting from scratch – we already have scientific knowledge, practical experience and growing opportunities for restoration. The next task is to bring the different pieces of this picture together: to understand where Bulgaria’s peatlands and peat-forming wetlands are, what condition they are in, and where conservation and restoration are most urgently needed.




















